This Blog has now moved to idebate.org/worlddebating - all future posts will be made there!

5 May 2001

World Public Speaking Championships Rules

World Universities

Public Speaking Championships Rules
(as passed at Worlds Council on 1st Jan 2001)

Part 1— Introduction



1.1 Format:



1.1.1 The competition shall consist of four rounds:



(a) Rounds 1 and 2 shall be contested by all registered participants



(b) The semi-finals shall be contested by the top twelve competitors.



(c) The final shall be contested by the top six competitors.



1.2 Speech Length



1.2.1 Speakers should deliver their speeches within the time limits set down below:



(a) Speeches in Rounds 1 and 2 should be between 3 and 4 minutes in length.



(b) Speeches in semi-finals should be between 4 and 5 minutes in length



(c) Speeches in the final should be between 5 and 6 minutes in length



1.3 Preparation



1.3.1 Speeches in one of the opening two rounds shall be on an impromptu topic, and on a pre-prepared topic in the other



1.3.2 In the impromptu rounds speakers will be given their topic immediately before the preceding competitor's speech, i.e. 3-5 minutes beforehand.



1.3.3 The topic for the pre-prepared round will be publicised at the beginning of the week, including at registration and at the main debaters' and adjudicators' briefings.



1.3.4 Topics for the semi-finals and final may be impromptu or announced in advance, at the discretion of the competition organisers.



1.3.5 Speakers will speak in an order to be drawn randomly, either at the briefing or upon assembly in their respective venues. This order may not subsequently be changed by the speakers, whether by mutual agreement or not, without the consent of the chair of adjudicators for that round.



1.4 Timing



1.4.1 The timing of speeches is primarily the responsibility of the individual speaker. Speakers will be given a time signal (a single knock of the gavel) at the beginning of the optimum speaking time and then again (a double knock) at the end of the optimum speaking time.



1.4.2 Speakers should note that speeches concluding substantially below the first gavel knock (more than 20 seconds early) or substantially after the second knock (more than 20 seconds late) will be penalised for poor time management.



Part 2— Topics



2.1 Choice of topics



2.1.1 Topics used in rounds of the Public Speaking Competition shall reflect the dignity and integrity of the competition and shall encourage and demand those qualities in both speakers and their speeches.



2.1.2 Topics may be selected by the hosts for theie particular local or national significance, but should in all cases be chosen with the international nature of the competition in mind.



2.2 Types of topic



2.2.1 Topics may be worded in the same manner as motions for debate.



2.2.2 Topics may be formed of quotations, famous sayings, phrases or proverbs.



2.2.3 Topics may be formed of lines of poetry, prose, song lyric or dramatic literature.



2.2.4 Topics may consist of objects, artefacts or other physical material.



2.2.5 Topics may consist of visual materials such as projected slides, photographs, artwork or other pictures.



2.2.6 Whatever form they take topics must offer speakers a clear and definite thematic line along which the speech may be developed.



Part 3— Elements



3.2 Matter



3.1.1 Matter refers to the substance, content or material developed during a speech. It includes the issue or issues that provide the thematic base of a speech, together with the ideas, arguments, evidence and support developed during the speech.



3.1.2 Elements of matter include arguments, ideas, observations, propositions, statements of opinion, facts, evidence, quotations, and sxamples of any kind.



3.1.3 Matter should be relevant to the topic, in so far as it is clearly linked to it and developed in a clear and logical fashion.



3.1.4 Matter will be assessed in terms of its effectiveness, both in communicating the speakers ideas, and supporting the speakers arguments.



3.1.5 Adjudicators should not allow bias to influence their assessment and should disregard and specialist knowledge they may have on the subject.



3.2 Manner



3.2.1 Manner refers to the style and delivery of a speaker, together with the overall structure of a speech.



3.2.2 Style may be characterised by a speakers persuasive skills, sincerity, confidence, rapport with the audience and ability, where appropriate to generate an emotional or intellectual response from them.



3.2.3 Elements of style include eye contact, voice modulation, hand gestures, language, the use of notes, rhetorical style and confidence, humour, and any other elements which enhances or detracts from the effectiveness of the speaker.



3.2.4 Use of humour should be rewarded by adjudicators where it is appropriate and complements the content, presentation and flow of the speech.



3.2.5 Structure may be characterised as the prioritisation of ideas and arguments, the provision where appropriate or clear linkage between material, and effective allocation of time.



3.2.6 Speeches should be structured in such a way as to optimise their effectiveness. This shouls include an introduction, development of argument or ideas and summary.



3.2.7 Manner will be assessed in terms of its effectiveness in aiding the speaker's communication, persuasuveness, and general presentation.



3.2.8 Adjudicators should be aware that at a World Championships there will be many styles of public speaking that are appropriate and should not allow bias to influence their assessment.



Part 4— Adjudication



4.1 Grading and marking of speakers.



4.1.1 Speakers should be assessed by adjudicators with the provisional award of a grade or mark at the end of each speech.



4.1.2 Once all the speakers have left, adjudicators will confer and agree on the ranking og the speakers from first to last. They should also agree on a grade for each speaker, according to the folloeing guidelines.



A 90 - 100: Excellent to flawless

Definately finals material. The speaker makes an excellent speech in almost every respect.

B 80-89: Above average to very good

The speaker might be expected to break to the semi-finals. A very good speech, possibly with some minor weaknesses, hesitation or lack of confidence.

C 70 - 79 Average

Unlikley to break to semi-finals. THe speaker has the major components of a speech in place, but also has major weaknesses.

D 60 - 69 Below average

The speech has serious flaws, may be poorly developed and delivered, and only minor strengths.

E 50-59 Very Poor

The speaker has fundamental weaknesses, and the speech is badly delivered, irrelevant, hesitant, and makes little or no connection with the audience.

4 May 2001

Hellenic Debating Association

Here is an e-mail about the Greek association



Dear all,

we would like to inform you that we have finally established a Hellenic Debating Association, in an effort to unite all individuals that are, or would like to become, involved with debating in Greece!



For more information on the goals as well as future plans of the organization you can contact us at the following address: hellenicdebating@yahoo.gr



The Governing Body



John Vlastaras - President

Phaeny Kessissoglou - Vice-President

Alexandra Kassimis - Secretary

Manolis Polychronides - Treasurer

Nikos Zartaloudis - Public Affairs

3 May 2001

World Council Minutes Glasgow 2001

Minutes - meeting of World Universities Debating Council

1 January 2001
Glasgow University Union Building

Chair - Colm Flynn
Secretary - Marika Muller

Agenda
Roll call
Glasgow Report and comments
Toronto bid confirmation
Financial report from Sydney
bids for WUDC 2003
Committee Reports
election of officers
- Bangladesh wanting to abolish ESL Competition
- Promotion of Croatia from 'C' to 'B' status
- delegates from new countries

1) Roll Call of Delegates
Australia - Catherine Orr - A
Canada - Ranjan Agarwal - A
England & Wales - Rob Weekes - A
Ireland - Sinead Lucey - A
Japan - Shotaro Tsuchibuchi - A
Scotland -Nick Bibby - A
South Africa - Kevin Burden - A
United States - Scott Luftglass - A
New Zealand - Kevin Moar - B
Croatia - Hano Ernst - C
India - Gauray Nayyar – C
Israel - Yehoshua Gurtler - C
Jamacia - Carlton Lowrie - C
Malaysia - Mohana Raj - C
Singapore - Jonathan Yuen - C
Thailand - Opnsapan Manuamopn - C
Bangladesh - Prashanta Bhushun Barua - D
Czech Republic - Milan Konrad - D
Estonia - Henri Enniste - D
Germany - Jan Hessbrugge - D
Greece -Manolis Polychronides - D
Pakistan - Bilal Murtaza Siddiqi - D
Portugal - Pedro Alves - D
Turkey - Evrim Altintas - D
Uzbekistan - Colin Spurway - D

Countries not represented
Philippines - A
China - B
Netherlands - C
Indonesia - D
Kyrghstan - D
Russia - D
Slovenia - D
Thailand - D
Trinidad & Tobago - D
Yugoslavia - D

Issue arising from this: Croatia status upgrade from C to B - have had three institutions for two years running, and this year have four. Check constitution and attendance records - determined to be correct, so Croatia's voting status is upgraded from C to B.

2) Glasgow Report and Comments
Lynne / anyone else from the Glasgow Organising Committee are not yet present (12:40pm), and we do need to wait for them

3) Confirmation of Toronto Bid
- will have a general overview from Toronto, then any questions

Overview
one important selling-point is the current weakness of the Canadian dollar, which is not expected to improve

Toronto itself is a really easy city to explore, with minimal distances to be covered between the accommodation (hotel) and the University campus.

the hotel booked is part of a top chain, and have given the tournament a really good deal. All rooms will be quad occupancy, and there will be various conferences spaces provided within the hotel itself.

the hotel is about a 25 min walk from the venues for the competition, but there WILL be shuttle busses running, and it is a 10 min cab ride or a short trip via direct subway link for those who miss the bus!

there isn't much detail that can be given about specific events at this stage

fundraising has been significant, events will have both food and drink, they will be held at a variety of locations, and entertainment will be provided for those not wishing to go out

the Tab system has not yet been finalised, T. are still looking at options

provisional dates are the same as with this tournament - 27th Dec to 4th Jan

the website, which is expected up at the end of January, can be found at www.worlds2002.com

Questions
­Thailand - what is the registration fee looking like? T - about the same as Glasgow, it can't be lowered as there is no access to free campus accommodation, but have got the best possible deal in terms of accommodation

Uzbekistan - if your fundraising is successful, would you consider the idea of a hardship fund for hard-up countries? T - will try if can get enough money in, but is proving hard to get corporate sponsorship...the initial response looks good, but can give no guarantees

New Zealand - will there be the same over-emphasis on black tie events? T - probably not. Will probably be one, and then semi-formal / cocktail events.

Ireland - what about team numbers, university caps? will Glasgow no-shows count against teams, and how will you deal with overflows?

Colm - can't penalise for no-shows here - was hardly their fault most of the time!

T - there is no official team cap as yet, is still dependent on $$ issues

Colm - in last years bid, you estimated about 400 teams, does that still stand? T - can't say yet, is an issue of logistics and efficiency, as well as funding.

Croatia - when are you looking at starting pre-reg? T - will look to initial expressions of interest in January, then pretty much the same as Glasgow.

Question - need to take all possible contingency measures, keep us informed during the tournament, provide more details and please do a dry run. T - have been watching what has happened at Glasgow - venues are Internet wired, so will be able to get info to participants quickly, are also well aware of the need for contingency plans and worst-case scenarios. And will be running an internal tournament using the same set-up just to make sure it all works.

Scotland - what will your policy be toward independents, and what will your registration deadline be? T - are running to the same general time-frame as Glasgow for the moment, as far as independents go, will be looking to have as much participation from them as this tournament.

Colm - are there any objections to the Toronto bid?? No

Toronto confirmed unopposed as hosts for Worlds 2002


3) Report form Sydney 2000
Dominic Knight and Layla De Melo representing Sydney.
- 2 issues to be dealt with - finances
- tabbing issues

Finances
Layla presented Sydney’s budget
ran to budget, broke even - will give copy of statement to Colm for ratification (see attached document)

in terms of the outstanding $1000 from Princeton, $500 was paid, and they will cover the outstanding amount

there are three outstanding debtors at this point, one big one which is the GUU, and then Strathclyde and Northwestern

- GUU - owe the amount of A$5615.30 for what Sydney provided for the Host Night Party. Bills have been sent and the amount is still outstanding and in some dispute - the GUU have to pay soonest Sydney letter to Glasgow

Colm - it must be raised with the GUU rep when they arrive

- Sydney ask the Council to bear it in mind that there is the precedent of sanctions for this kind of problem, and that they wish Council to apply the same format of sanction as used with Princeton in the past i.e. either agree staggered payments or Glasgow banned from future competitions.

- the other two debtors are minor amounts and are being checked

- Strathclyde - A$1625 for 2 debaters and an adjudicator

- NorthWestern - A$840 for extra accommodation

Colm - have the GUU paid for this years Hosts Night? Toronto - T have already paid Glasgow for the Toronto night.

Tab issues

- Dominic the Sydney Tab was run off the 'Tabroom' software, developed for them by R. Edwards of Baylor University in Texas

- Unfortunately it cannot be made available at this point as has been requested, as there are several problems with it, and the bugs cannot be fixed until the creator has been contacted - and this Sydney have not been able to do.

- as far as the distribution of results goes, the programme was supposed to produce a full spread sheet, but the module didn't work, so Sydney is unable to release the results until the problem is fixed.

- Council should control its release, but also need someone to chase down the original programmer! Dom will send Colm a copy of the Tab system.

- Colm - this is something for the new Committee to deal with

- - Israel - can we please get full results, incl speaker points, for all the teams? Dom yup, will look into it, if you want to chase them down, Dom's e-mail is DomK@bigpond.com

- Colm - is the data still stored? D - yes, but unsure as to its correctness

- Mark - did Sydney pay for the programme? D - no, the Princeton money was used, but the programme is Council property

- Colm - given his experience, would just like to say that it was the best organised tournament he's been to and would like to commend Sydney

Still no sign of Glasgow, so continue through agenda

4) bids for 2003
only one bid so far - University of Stellenbosch, South Africa

Kevin Burden as Convenor to look through bid document and take questions

(refer here to copy of bid document)

Questions

Dom Knight - try make the Tab as quick as possible, and please try make it accessible as well.

New Zealand - will there be a yukka night? K - can rest assured it will be the biggest yukka night ever!

Comments apart from the actual bid document

As far as funding goes, have nothing concrete yet, until the bid is confirmed, but have the two largest breweries in South Africa promising both alcohol and corporate sponsorship, and Stellenbosch are looking to have at least half the necessary money covered by sponsorship

- all possible contingencies will be covered, have learned from the problems in Glasgow.

Adjudication / Tab issues
Marika Muller as CA

removals form the Tab will be dealt with ASAP - all venues will be computerised, and updated from a central database

computers and net links in venues will mean that speed ballots will be inputted directly

lots of helpers in each building

will be an electronic check-in system for the briefings, which will feed directly into the database and thus the tab, which will run from the database

will be holding joint briefings for debaters and adjudicators in the one venue, where a joint Tab draw will be shown - this will hopefully avoid confusions of phrasing between briefings

Questions
Greece - can you give us an idea of a projected total registration cost, as have been seeing it get higher every year, and it is hard for many to get that money together? K - it will not be more, and is projected to be less than Glasgow - can give you no more details than that at this stage

Greece - what about factoring in the cost of flights? K - at moment, can not tell you more than that, but there are cheap fares, you just have to look around.

Colm – Recently found that you can get relatively cheap to South Africa, just do some research and be careful of your timing and don’t take the first price you get. Perhaps the Stellenbosch Bid committee could try help people liaise with cheap flights / student travel Assoc. from within South Africa

Scotland - Nick, in his capacity as a long-serving hack and alcoholic on Worlds Council, would just like to give Stellenbosch his full support and commend it to the rest of Council

Uzbekistan - what do you think about the idea of a hardship fund? K - we already have the problem that some SA Universities would not be able to pay the Worlds Entry fees even for Stellenbosch, so we are aware of the problem. The question is at what point can we realistically start putting money into such a fund for the greater debating community. Suggest that individual universities take the initiative of looking for sponsorship from appropriate educational and cultural funds, and Stellenbosch will update on progress of any potential fund.

Mark Dowling - there is an economic precedent set for setting entry fees based on a countries GDP, if it gets to that

Kevin - Are we bound by the Worlds Constitution as to what we can do with entry fees? Colm - No, is completely at the discretion of the Organising Committee

Canada - central to this is the idea of value for money - people don't generally mind paying, as long as they see they are getting something decent for their money, this needs to be emphasised and taken into account by all concerned

New Zealand - when comes to issues of money, the big problem is almost always the issue of actually getting there.

Colm - any other bids? NO

- any opposition to Stellenbosch's bid? NO

the Stellenbosch bid to host WUDC 2003 is approved, subject to final ratification at Toronto Worlds


5) Committee Reports
General - Colm Flynn
· the committee elected in Sydney was Omar Salahuddin (Chair), Colm Flynn (Registrar) and Rob Silver (Secretary), plus Regional Reps, a Women's Officer (Meg O’Sullivan), and the CA and Convenor of Glasgow Worlds

- please note that the Committee (and Council as a whole) wishes to thank Omar for the many years he has given to debating and look forward to seeing him at future championships after his sailing trip ends.

- the Council website is in the process of being developed beyond the experimental stage. the test database was at www.debating.net/wudc, the NEW and CURRENT site can be found at www.wudc.org. Colm wants to thank Wilbert form the Philippines for his help in getting it set up (in a less text-dependent form!). There are issues around who will maintain this site on an Live basis but that should be resolved by the committee.

Other issues
- Women's issues and their representation on the Committee

- there are the contentions of the women's forum, especially the issue of wether or not men are allowed to attend

- direct issues of individual discrimination / harassment cannot be discussed there, as the risk of 'trial by rumour' is far too great

- were ultimately no recommendations made, will continue with the status quo, where it is up to the individual hosts to decide who is admitted.

- Adjudicator accreditation

- This issue is concerned with how judges are ranked and “break”. There has been a perception that who you drink with or the college you are from can unfairly influence a your ranking. Traditionally it has been regarded that only the best debaters make the best judges. That is slowly changing to reflect the excellent judges out there who never had successful debating careers. However more needs to be done to help identify these judges and ensure that the best judging is brought to the fore at Worlds.

- There are always going to be questions over adjudicators' decisions, all you can do is try to make sure you appoint the most qualified adjudicators, and just try and keep an eye on them. It is very important to get feedback from the debaters and act on that feedback. If teams go out of their way to issue a complaint in the feedback forms than this should be followed up with the team. Similarly if a lower ranked judge is highly praised in feedback then their ranking should be reviewed to make sure that they are not under-rated.

- Acknowledged the need for more intense adjudicator testing and training, as well as checking of qualifications

- videos need to be made more widely available, perhaps even one to every university who requests it - will be too hard to get regional reps to take responsibility for its distribution

- Council supports the idea of extending the videos

- A big question is what you about the fabrication of experience

- need to try to get information from the Regional bodies as to how their adjudicators are ranked (the actual process, as well as the individual rankings). Committee should gather Adjudicator rankings from past Worlds and also Europeans, Austral-asians, and similar large international competition. These rankings should then be made available to future competitions.



Standardisation Issues - Rob Silver
- last year, the US representative raised the idea that we should allow potential hosts to bid for the Championship in the style of their choice, and the Masters Competition within the style of the host university.

- it is not an issues to be dismissed out of hand

- there is an argument for the proposal, and Worlds has lost many US Universities as a result of the refusal to consider a change

- Canada are suggesting that if nothing else, the Master's Comp be held in the home style of the hosts

- conclusions of the Committee are that there can be no change as yet, but that there needs to be a review of regional attitudes to such an idea. However, the idea that Masters be held in the local style is a good one.

Question - are there any objections to the idea of a host-based change in style for Masters? NO

Masters should therefore be held in the “Local” style at future competitions.



ESL Issues - Yehoshua Gurtler

- issues are especially ones of qualification and the competition itself. Have been discussed at some length since Sydney, with the crucial question the one over who qualifies as an ESL competitor.

- are four basic criteria for determining this status

§ the language of the country

§ language of instruction in institution

§ language spoken at home

§ does the debaters level of English place a burden on their participation at Worlds?

- have left the idea of the 'honour system' in place - trust to the initial declaration by a speaker that they are ESL

- issue of possibility of establishing an ESL committee to discuss ESL issues and make recommendations for improvements to next years council and to help resolve ESL qualification issues

- two countering problems, with worry of EFL domination of decision making as well as the need to integrate ESL within the tournament.

- possible problems of this committee

§ how would you decide representation of countries where there were both EFL and ESL debaters (ie South Africa, Singapore, India, Pakistan) - ultimately, the National rep would have to cover both bases.

§ also a concern of the development of a clique mentality - would be over-ridden by the fact that Worlds Council will maintain full and final authority.

- New Zealand - please clarify the role of this Committee

§ to re-examine in depth the ESL criteria; to check the lists of those registered, and to rule on ESL issues (with a right of appeal to Worlds Council)

- general feeling seems to be that the idea is a good one, but that details need to be worked out

- Croatia - are you looking to amend the constitution?

§ YG - no, rather for a general decision form Council and then ratification

§ basic idea is that need a committee of ESL-focused people, as these are the issues that can get neglected at the general Worlds Council meetings.

§ Colm: The constitution cannot be changed at the moment, but would be a good idea to have a temporary committee who can make a report on the issue. The Constitution ultimately does need reviewing, and it is recommended that the Committee looks at this (with the proviso that any proposed changes are presented at least 72 hours before the main Council meeting in Toronto)

- issue of excluding teams who break in the EFL draw from breaking in the ESL draw was not an issue this year, but are some aspects that may need to be looked at in future

§ the rationale is that if you can make the EFL break, then your English cannot be considered an impediment to your debating.

§ we need more clarity on the recommendation that anyone who ever breaks as EFL can never break as ESL - the recommendation is that the emphasis must be placed on the individual who breaks and not the Institution as a whole, however some feeling is towards the institution. The ESL committee is required to look at this.

§ issue raised of ESL adjudicators through the break - has increased in Glasgow, but could get better. Point raised that the best judges should break and that experience should be the deciding factor. EFL/ESL should be secondary to experience as a judge. Feeling that the tradition that the most successful debaters make the best judges may discriminate against excellent ESL judges.

§ Also the issue of having ESL adjudicators for Masters where possible. This year it was acknowledged that there was a shortage of judges willing to judge masters.

- Colm – Bangladesh have a proposal to drop the ESL competition altogether?

§ Bangladesh - are withdrawing the proposal, but would still like to note that there are all kinds of problems inherent with how you define / qualify ESL participants

- Croatia - you say that individuals who have broken in EFL will be prohibited from the ESL break, but won't this disadvantage the ESL speaker who is their speaking partner?


§ YG -debating is a 'team sport', and the result of allowing a team with one ESL and one EFL speaker would be that the EFL speaker pulls their team-mate's standard up with them. This rule will help deal with the issue of problems arising tournament after tournament.

- Composition of ESL committee

§ Initial idea is 5 members, with the Chair sitting on Council
§ nominations Israeli delegate - Yehoshua
South African delegate - Kevin
Portugal - Pedro
Japan -
Germany - Jan
Croatia - Hano
Thailand - Manuaian
Bangladesh – Bulwar

- Decided that all 8 sit on committee, Chair of committee will be selected by them.

§ Singapore - want to raise issue of NUS's qualifications as an ESL team as result of their language proficiency. You cannot base your decision on ESL on the working language of a country - the language spoken at home is generally their mother-tongue. Request that honour system is maintained. Would like to assure Council that the NUS teams in question are indeed ESL.

o Colm - acknowledge the problems of defining a team one way or the other. The honour system is crucial, but bear in mind that if it is abused and this is discovered, there will be serious damage done to ESL at Worlds.


Glasgow Report - no-one from Glasgow here yet, so move on to election of Committee

6) Election of Committee
- Committee comprises of
Chair
Secretary
Registrar
Regional Reps - North America Africa
Iona Asia
Europe Oceania
Women's Rep
International Development
Convenor and Chief Adj of next Tournament

nominations for Chair of Committee
- Colm (Israel nominates, New Zealand seconds)
- Ranjan (Canada nominates, USA seconds)
secret ballot weighted voting
result - Colm Flynn elected

nominations for Registrar - Nick Bibby (UK nominates, Uzbekistan seconds)
- no other nominations, elected unopposed

nominations for Secretary - Yehoshua Gurtler (Australia nominates, Greece seconds)
- no other nominations, elected unopposed

2 May 2001

Toronto Bid to host 2002 WUDC

Here is the bid document submitted by Toronto to host Worlds in 2002









AustralAsian 2001 Team & Speaker Tab

Champions: Monash A (Tim Sonnreich, Amanda Wolthuizen and Luke Oliver)


Best Speaker Steve Bell (Melbourne-A)

The Tab:
Rank Team University Wins Loses Points

1 Melbourne-A Melbourne University 6 1 1874
2 Sydney-A University of Sydney 6 1 1869.5
3 Monash-A Monash University 6 1 1865.3
4 Sydney-B University of Sydney 6 1 1865.2
5 NSW-A University of New South Wales 6 1 1864.2
6 Monash-B Monash University 6 1 1864
7 Melbourne-B Melbourne University 5 2 1877
8 Cambridge University of Cambridge 5 2 1865
9 Sydney-D University of Sydney 5 2 1856.4
10 NSW-B University of New South Wales 5 2 1854.2
11 NUS-A National University of Singapore 5 2 1848.3
12 ANU-A Australian National University 5 2 1847.6
13 Melbourne-C Melbourne University 5 2 1847.3
14 Melbourne-E Melbourne University 5 2 1847.2
15 ADM Ateneo de Manila University 5 2 1845.5
16 Monash-C Monash University 5 2 1845.3
17 Sydney-C University of Sydney 5 2 1842.5
18 VUW Victoria University of Wellington 5 2 1841.5
19 CU-A Chulalongkorn University 5 2 1830.7
20 NUS-B National University of Singapore 5 2 1826.4
21 Melbourne-D Melbourne University 4 3 1843.2
22 UTS-B University of Technology Sydney 4 3 1841
23 MMU-B Multimedia University 4 3 1840.6
24 UTS-A University of Technology Sydney 4 3 1838.1
25 UST-A University of Santo Tomas 4 3 1836
26 UTS-C University of Technology Sydney 4 3 1835.9
27 IIUM-B International Islamic University Malaysia 4 3 1834
28 NTU-A Nanyang Technological University 4 3 1832.8
29 UQ University of Queensland 4 3 1832.1
30 NSW-D University of New South Wales 4 3 1831.6
31 NUS-C National University of Singapore 4 3 1831.1
32 MMU-A Multimedia University 4 3 1830.3
33 NSW-C University of New South Wales 4 3 1829.6
34 Sydney-E University of Sydney 4 3 1826.3
35 Monash-D Monash University 4 3 1825.8
36 NTU-B Nanyang Technological University 4 3 1825.5
37 NTU-C Nanyang Technological University 4 3 1825
38 JHU John Hopkins University 4 3 1823.7
39 FEU Far Eastern University 4 3 1818.5
40 ANU-B Australian National University 4 3 1811.8
41 Monash-E Monash University 4 3 1810.6
42 BNU Bina Nusantara University 4 3 1805.1
43 NTU-D Nanyang Technological University 3 4 1836.5
44 IIUM-C International Islamic University Malaysia 3 4 1830
45 UST-B University of Santo Tomas 3 4 1826.5
46 UOI-D University of Indonesia 3 4 1825.4
47 Otago University of Otago 3 4 1825.3
48 UPM Universiti Putra Malaysia 3 4 1822.8
49 Malaya-A University of Malaya 3 4 1818.8
50 IIUM-A International Islamic University Malaysia 3 4 1815.8
51 UHK-C University of Hong Kong 3 4 1814.2
52 UHK-B University of Hong Kong 3 4 1814
53 Malaya-B University of Malaya 3 4 1813.3
54 UOI-A University of Indonesia 3 4 1812.5
55 DU-B Delhi University 1 3 4 1812.3
56 IIUM-F International Islamic University Malaysia 3 4 1811.3
57 UTM-B University Technology Malaysia(UTM) 3 4 1810.6
58 DU-A Delhi University 1 3 4 1810.3
59 Sydney-F University of Sydney 3 4 1810.1
60 IIUM-E International Islamic University Malaysia 3 4 1808.5
61 NYP Nanyang Polytechnic 3 4 1807.2
62 BOND Bond University 3 4 1805.9
63 IIUM-D International Islamic University Malaysia 3 4 1803.3
64 ACU Atmajaya Catholic University 3 4 1802.3
65 NLS National Law School of India University 3 4 1800.3
66 NUS-D National University of Singapore 2 5 1829.6
67 UHK-A University of Hong Kong 2 5 1821.3
68 UOI-C University of Indonesia 2 5 1809.6
69 Mara-A University Technology Mara 2 5 1805.8
70 Monash-F Monash University 2 5 1804
71 UHK-D University of Hong Kong 2 5 1800.5
72 NP-A Ngee Ann Polytechnic 2 5 1800
73 CU-B Chulalongkorn University 2 5 1799
74 UTM-A University Technology Malaysia(UTM) 2 5 1796.2
75 NP-B Ngee Ann Polytechnic 2 5 1788.2
76 ICU International Christian University 2 5 1787
77 Mara-B University Technology Mara 2 5 1784.3
78 TP Temasek Polytechnic 2 5 1784
79 UOI-B University of Indonesia 1 6 1819.5
80 HKBU-A Hong Kong Baptist University 1 6 1788
81 SWCU Satya Wacana Christian University 1 6 1774.5
82 RUPP Royal University of Phnom Penh 1 6 1759
83 HKBU-B Hong Kong Baptist University 1 6 1746.1
84 HKBU-C Hong Kong Baptist University 0 7 1767.6

 
Speaker Tab
 
Rank Name_Person Name_Institution Team Final


1 Steve Bell Melbourne University A 539.67

2 Perry David Herzfeld Melbourne University A 538.67

3 Sarah Lilian Kennedy Melbourne University B 538.33

4 Daniel Peter Piccinin Melbourne University B 537.33

5 Alex Macoun University of Sydney B 536.67

6 Ani Satchithananda University of Sydney A 535.67

6 Wu Meng Tan University of Cambridge A 535.66

8 Sam Gifford Melbourne University B 535.33

9 Brad Lancken University of Sydney B 534.34

9 Sebastian Mark Isaac University of Cambridge A 534.33

9 Allan Edward Doohan University of Sydney A 534.32

12 Michael Eric Smith Monash University B 534

12 Richard Howard University of New South Wales A 534

14 Ivan AhSam University of Sydney D 533.67

14 Tim Sonnreich Monash University A 533.66

14 Vanessa Jade Collins University of New South Wales B 533.66

17 Andrew Fitch Monash University B 533.5

18 Oscar Louis McLaren University of Sydney D 533.33

19 Luke Oliver Monash University A 533

19 Alexander James Croft University of Sydney A 533

21 James Abbott University of New South Wales B 531.66

22 Therese Fitzgerald Melbourne University A 531.34

22 Kate Mason University of New South Wales A 531.33

24 Jonathan Yuen National University of Singapore A 531

25 James Mark Acton University of Cambridge A 530.67

25 Nicholas Gillard Melbourne University C 530.66

27 Nicola Valentine Willis Victoria University of Wellington A 530.33

28 William Bacani Panlilio Ateneo de Manila University A 530

28 Tracy Lee Monash University B 530

28 Cassie McGannon Monash University C 530

31 Andrew Peterson Melbourne University E 529.67

31 Harveen Singh Narulla National University of Singapore A 529.67

31 Katherine Louise Fallah University of New South Wales B 529.67

31 Ian Philip Holmes University of New South Wales A 529.66

35 Hamish Quinn University of Sydney B 529.34

35 Paul David Barnsley Australian National University A 529.33

37 MADELEINE MOSS Australian National University A 529

37 Alyson Louise Eather University of Technology Sydney A 529

39 Amanda Louise Wolthuizen Monash University A 528.66

40 Daniel Evstifeev Melbourne University E 528.34

40 Alice Marie Muhlebach Melbourne University C 528.33

40 ARNEL CABER ORDAS University of Santo Tomas A 528.33

40 Vinay Kameswaran Nanyang Technological University D 528.33

40 Thomas Agnew University of Technology Sydney B 528.33

45 Lee Chern Hsing Multimedia University B 528

45 N Daniel Mookhey University of Technology Sydney B 528

47 Anthony Edward Jones University of Sydney C 527.66

48 Melissa Bubnic Melbourne University E 527.34

48 Jared Robert Heath Melbourne University D 527.33

50 Andrew William Jory Australian National University A 527

50 Doug Stewart Monash University C 527

50 Shashwat Khandelwal Nanyang Technological University D 527

50 Jonathan Darwent Sise Melbourne University D 526.99

50 Melissa Clarke Melbourne University C 526.99

55 Jennifer Smith Monash University D 526.67

56 Ramona Vijeyarasa University of New South Wales D 526.51

57 Annie Diana Multimedia University B 526.33

57 Tamara Joan Hunter University of Technology Sydney A 526.33

57 Bobby Gervacio Benedicto Ateneo de Manila University A 526.33

60 Irzal Kamal International Islamic University Malaysia B 526

60 Sucharit Pongprakyun Universiti Putra Malaysia A 526

60 Yatungka Widders University of Technology Sydney C 526

60 Desak Putu Adhityani University of Indonesia C 525.99

60 Alice Grey University of Sydney C 525.99

65 Ravi Kavasery John Hopkins University A 525.66

65 Siddhartha Rao Karri National University of Singapore A 525.66

67 Hanaan Jalal International Islamic University Malaysia B 525.34

67 Hui Chieh Lee Nanyang Technological University A 525.34

67 Nadia Zainuddin International Islamic University Malaysia C 525.33

67 Nataraj Muthu Krishna Nanyang Technological University A 525.33

67 Henry KienHung Yeo National University of Singapore D 525.33

72 Amrita Kapur University of New South Wales C 525.16

73 FRANCO GARCIA LARCINA University of Santo Tomas A 525

73 Ruth Merewyn Greenwood University of Sydney C 525

75 Kylie Marie Lane Monash University C 524.67

75 Mohanaraj Multimedia University A 524.67

75 BigKevin AndrewJohn Moar Victoria University of Wellington A 524.67

78 Idauli Laurens Tamarin University of Indonesia D 524.49

79 Madeleine Yang Dy Ateneo de Manila University A 524.33

79 Shahrul Mizan International Islamic University Malaysia C 524.33

81 WeiYuan Shih Chulalongkorn University A 524

81 Mirza Shaheryar Baig National University of Singapore C 524

81 Nathan Sinnathurai University of Sydney E 524

81 Joanne Nicole Lennan University of Technology Sydney C 524

81 ARLENE MAPA MANEJA University of Santo Tomas A 523.99

86 Duncan James Small Victoria University of Wellington A 523.67

86 Suresh Gnasegarah Multimedia University B 523.66

86 Shibu Menon Nanyang Technological University B 523.66

86 Venkatraghavan Sivaramakrishnan Nanyang Technological University C 523.66

86 Tom Michael Georgeson University of New South Wales D 523.66

91 Katie McLellan University of New South Wales C 523.5

91 Renee Saibi University of Technology Sydney C 523.5

93 Joeven Rosario Castro Far Eastern University A 523.34

93 Kusuma Wardhani Teteh University of Indonesia B 523.34

93 Peifu Hsieh Chulalongkorn University A 523.33

93 Laura Thomas University of Sydney D 523.33

93 Anna Leigh Bachmann University of Sydney E 523.33

98 Jasmine Claire Moseley Monash University F 522.83

99 Raihan Ismail International Islamic University Malaysia C 522.67

99 Ryan Leggio John Hopkins University A 522.67

99 Nandini Seshadri Nanyang Technological University C 522.67

99 Cindy Hui University of Hong Kong A 522.67

99 Jo Cathlin Walker University of Queensland A 522.67

99 Kenneth Thomas Stanton University of Technology Sydney B 522.67

99 Wai Mun Theng National University of Singapore D 522.66

99 James Tynan University of Technology Sydney A 522.66

107 Anthony Simon Levin University of New South Wales D 522.5

108 Abhishek Kapur National University of Singapore B 522.34

108 Ria Nuri Darmawan University of Indonesia D 522.34

108 Stef Salmon Melbourne University D 522.33

108 Jacob Abraham Nanyang Technological University B 522.33

108 Logandran Balavijendran Multimedia University A 522.33

108 Katherine Frances Wevers University of Otago A 522.33

108 Jacqueline Jenwey Mantle University of Queensland A 522.33

115 Nazrul Nizam Mohd Zameri University Technology Mara A 522.17

116 Rahul Desai National University of Singapore C 522.01

116 Sumithra Multimedia University A 522

116 Gandha Wiraraharja University of Indonesia C 522

119 RyanChristopher Tan Usita University of Santo Tomas B 521.67

119 ROHAN DUTTA Delhi University 1 A 521.66

121 Vinoth Viknesh University of Malaya A 521.33

121 Ravi Viswanathan Nanyang Technological University D 521.33

121 Chris John Boast Monash University E 521.33

121 Abhishek Jaiswal National University of Singapore B 521.33

121 Julie Elizabeth McKay University of Queensland A 521.33

126 Damien Agius Bond University A 521

126 Majidah Hashim Universiti Putra Malaysia A 521

126 Anthony Chan University of Hong Kong A 521

126 Sinta Satriana Sinta University of Indonesia C 521

130 Katie Fung University of Hong Kong C 520.68

130 Tom Chapman Monash University D 520.67

130 Kais Kaizar Badami Nanyang Technological University A 520.67

130 Namrata Verma Nanyang Technological University C 520.67

130 bek yasmin hamed Australian National University B 520.66

130 Amod Kumar Agarwala Nanyang Technological University B 520.66

136 Pamela Candice Fung University of Hong Kong B 520.5

137 HARIAH PARVIN NATCHIAR International Islamic University Malaysia E 520.33

137 Paula Glynn Monash University E 520.33

139 Priyanjali Sen Delhi University 1 B 520.01

139 Aviva Selma Nababan Atmajaya Catholic University A 520

139 Nani Bte Abdul Rahman International Islamic University Malaysia F 520

139 Enoch Li University of Hong Kong C 520

139 Choen Hoe Cheang University Technology Malaysia(UTM) B 520

139 Sally Tang National University of Singapore C 519.99

145 Rully Sabdra Rully University of Indonesia A 519.83

146 Brent Walter Australian National University B 519.67

146 Rubini Murugesan University of Malaya B 519.67

146 Andrew John Charlier University of New South Wales C 519.67

149 Emily Kate Byrne Australian National University B 519.34

149 Rosamond Betsy Connelly University of Otago A 519.34

149 Eng Chin Teo University Technology Malaysia(UTM) B 519.34

149 Hurman B Hussain University Technology Mara A 519.34

149 Azrul Izzam International Islamic University Malaysia B 519.33

149 Rajat Bhattacharya Monash University D 519.33

149 Dayu Nirma Amurwati University of Indonesia A 519.33

156 Yip Yew Keong University of Malaya A 519.17

157 Adrian Leung University of Hong Kong C 519.01

157 Ruangkhaoc Chanchai Chulalongkorn University A 519

157 Nikhil Eswara Chandra National Law School of India University A 519

157 Simon Hugh Connell University of Otago A 519

161 Sahil Chanana Delhi University 1 B 518.67

161 Firdaus Shah Jonid Universiti Putra Malaysia A 518.67

161 Ignatius Puguh Priambodo University of Indonesia D 518.67

161 Eric Villanueva delaCruz University of Santo Tomas B 518.67

165 Cut Hilda Meutia University of Indonesia B 518.35

166 Karen SuHui Teoh National University of Singapore B 518.33

166 Victor Mark Mungen John Hopkins University A 518.33

168 Dyah Yasmina Dyah University of Indonesia A 518.16

169 Istaq Nadzril International Islamic University Malaysia D 518

169 Jovin Kumar Hurry National University of Singapore D 518

169 Joan Lau University of Hong Kong B 518

172 Ang Hean Leng University of Malaya A 517.83

173 Ryan Chua Buenafe Far Eastern University A 517.66

173 Kanya Satwika Kanya University of Indonesia B 517.66

173 Anthony Michael Tesvic University of Sydney F 517.66

176 Jonathan Stuart Burnett University of Sydney F 517.34

176 Annabelle Kibanoff Mercado Far Eastern University A 517.33

178 Ully Noviani Lugina Bina Nusantara University A 517.16

179 Karni Binti Ibrahim University Technology Malaysia(UTM) B 517

180 Kaushik Barua Delhi University 1 A 516.67

180 Daniel Yeo Nanyang Polytechnic A 516.67

180 MichaelEduard Koch Arroyo University of Santo Tomas B 516.67

180 Devakhi Pandiri Nathan University of Malaya B 516.66

180 Zuliana Razali University of Malaya B 516.66

185 Yom Shahrina AbdulLahsan International Islamic University Malaysia D 516.34

185 Adrian Tang Nanyang Polytechnic A 516.33

185 Abigail Wong University of Hong Kong A 516.33

188 PATRICIA VERONICA Bina Nusantara University A 516.17

189 Alexander YanWai Law Monash University F 516

190 Nazrina Zaimul Azizdun University Technology Mara A 515.83

191 Aasim Khan Delhi University 1 B 515.67

191 Rendie Ferdinand Rumayar Bina Nusantara University A 515.66

193 Shalini Nanwani University of Hong Kong B 515.34

193 Neha Kaul Delhi University 1 A 515.33

193 Pang Keep Ying, Joey Nanyang Polytechnic A 515.33

193 Amelia Rose Pulsford University of Sydney F 515.33

197 Takashi Ikeda International Christian University A 515

197 Fionnuala Browne University of Sydney E 515

197 Carina Garland Monash University E 514.99

200 Jen Huizhen Wang NgeeAnn Polytechnic A 514.83

201 Halian Fadzli Shah International Islamic University Malaysia E 514.67

202 Coulibali Omar International Islamic University Malaysia D 514.34

202 Shareen Ng NgeeAnn Polytechnic B 514.34

202 Leah Campbell Bond University A 514.33

202 MIRSAD MIRSAD MIRSAD International Islamic University Malaysia E 514.33

206 Muhamad Raffi Ismail NgeeAnn Polytechnic A 514.17

207 Takeshi Sano International Christian University A 514

207 Khaniff Lau NgeeAnn Polytechnic B 514

209 Ginger Wilson NgeeAnn Polytechnic A 513.83

210 Darwin Lau University of Hong Kong D 513.67

210 Suhanthy Hamsanathan Bond University A 513.67

210 Badri Natrajan National Law School of India University A 513.66

213 Ungku Majid Bin Ungku Abu Bakar University Technology Mara B 513.5

214 Vivek Kumar Jha National Law School of India University A 513.33

215 Irma Nurzahrah International Islamic University Malaysia F 512.67

215 Elaine Luk University of Hong Kong D 512.67

217 Harish Janak Shah Temasek Polytechnic A 512.33

217 Huey Li Lim University Technology Malaysia(UTM) A 512.33

219 Lana Lubomirska Monash University F 512.17

220 Jonathan Jason Borock International Christian University A 512

220 Yougarajan AL Suppiah University Technology Malaysia(UTM) A 512

222 Neisam Faad Wijaya Atmajaya Catholic University A 511.67

222 Frances Lorraine Sinanu Satya Wacana Christian University A 511.66

224 Aji Abu Temasek Polytechnic A 511.5

224 Albert Wong University of Hong Kong D 511.5

226 KwaiYing Lee Hong Kong Baptist University A 510.66

227 Kaewta Tachamahachai Chulalongkorn University B 510.51

228 Mohd Hilmi B Mokhtar University Technology Mara B 510.33

229 Stacy Kristine Ho Chulalongkorn University B 510.16

230 Wan Mohd Asnur Bin Wan Jantan International Islamic University Malaysia F 510

230 Pooi San Kok University Technology Malaysia(UTM) A 510

232 Siti Saodah Md Salleh Temasek Polytechnic A 509.67

233 Virak Chan Royal University of Phnom Penh A 509.33

234 Shermaine WaiHeng Wong NgeeAnn Polytechnic B 509.17

235 WingChun Fok Hong Kong Baptist University A 509

235 Elvira Lestari Wijayanti Satya Wacana Christian University A 509

237 Albertus Dwitya Nucifera Satya Wacana Christian University A 508.34

238 Firdaus University Technology Mara B 508.17

239 NgaSaiLilvia Au Hong Kong Baptist University C 507

240 Thidavadee Nilawongs Chulalongkorn University B 506.5

241 KamWing Lau Hong Kong Baptist University C 506.34

241 Santi Kurniasari Hanjoyo Atmajaya Catholic University A 506.33

243 KHEMARA KHIEV Royal University of Phnom Penh A 504.67

244 KaMan Yu Hong Kong Baptist University A 504.34

245 MingHong Yeung Hong Kong Baptist University C 502.33

246 WaiYee Yeung Hong Kong Baptist University B 500.33

247 Pheakny Sou Royal University of Phnom Penh A 500

248 HinLok Tsang Hong Kong Baptist University B 496.33

249 PuiSze Chan Hong Kong Baptist University B 495.32

250 Mediha Mahmood International Islamic University Malaysia A 451.01

251 Azahan Azad International Islamic University Malaysia A 448.34

252 Cherno Marenah International Islamic University Malaysia A 444

All Asians Speaker Tab 2001

RANK NAME TEAM NAME TOTAL POINTS


1 FRANCO LARCINA UST1 539

2 BURHAN KAWOSA IIU1 538.667

3 WILLIAM PANLILIO ADMU1 538.167

4 ARLENE MANEJA UST1 537.917

5 IVAN EVETOVICS IIU1 535

6 MOHD SANI ISMAIL IIU1 534.667

7 DIANE DESIERTO UPD3 534

8 MORI RODRIGUEZ UPD2 533.917

9 AUDREY ZAENS UST2 531.917

10 FABIAN MANGAHAS ADMU1 531.667

11 BOBBY BENEDICTO ADMU1 531.333

11 BRIAN DURUIN DLSU2 531.333

12 LUCINDA DAVID DLSU1 530.083

13 CAMILLE NG ADMU2 530

14 KAREN MAH CUHK1 529.833

15 VALERIE REMOQUILLO ADD2 529.5

16 AZAHAN AZAD IIU2 529.167

17 PAM MANUEL UPD2 528.833

18 JOSEPH LABAN UPD2 528.667

18 ROY SANTILLAN DLSU2 528.667

19 SUMITHRA RAJENDRA MMU3 528

20 IYAN ADEWUYA FEU1 527.667

21 JAN TIU DLSU1 527.167

22 RITCHELLE DESINGANO UPM1 527

23 MAITA SAYO ADMU5 526.833

23 MARK GARCIA SILLIMAN2 526.833

24 DENNY DACQUEL UPM1 526.583

25 ERIC DELA CRUZ UST2 526.5

26 MALOU MARTIN UST2 526.417

27 PETITE APOSTOL ADMU2 526.333

28 ROMMELROJAS ADD3 526.167

29 SUNAINA GULATI MAHIDOL1 525.917

30 CARLO OLIVAR UST1 525.667

31 IRZAL KAMAL IIU2 525.583

32 TIZREENA ISMAIL PUTRA1 525.5

33 JINKY ZARAGOSA USLS2 525.417

34 ARCHIE GONZALES UST3 525.333

35 DYAN MABUNGA MINDANAO 525

36 ARNELL UYCHOCO UPD3 524.833

37 HARVEY VILLARICA ADMU2 524.667

37 JEFFREY CORONEL MINDANAO 524.667

38 JOEY PANG NYP1 524.583

38 MALOU FLORES UPM1 524.583

39 MARY ANNE FAJARDO ADMU5 524.5

39 GAIL TOTANES DLSU2 524.5

39 BRYAN DIOSMA MINDANAO 524.5

40 RAIHAN ISMAIL IIU3 524.333

41 MAHA HANAAN JALAL IIU3 524.167

42 GREG MARIE USLS1 524

43 GRACE MACABUHAY ADD2 523.583

43 LI P'ING YU MMU2 523.583

43 ANNA RAMOS UPM2 523.583

44 JOEVEN CASTRO FEU1 523.5

45 DAISY SANCHEZ USLS1 523.333

46 JANE UY ADD3 523.167

46 WHITNEY CHAN CUHK1 523.167

46 MAJIDAH HASHIM PUTRA1 523.167

46 DOMINIQUE BAUTISTA UAP1 523.167

47 PSYCHE FONTANILLA UPD5 523

48 GLENN CENABRE ADD3 522.833

48 SAGAR JHALANI MAHIDOL2 522.833

48 MOHANARAJ KRISHNAN MMU1 522.833

48 ROSALIE RAMIREZ UST3 522.833

48 STEPHANIE ABIERA ADD2 522.833

48 MARCELO FERNANDEZ UPD5 522.833

49 JENNY ELMACO SILLIMAN1 522.75

50 RAVI SHANTAR VERMA NYP1 522.667

51 LESTER OLAYER ADMU3 522.5

51 SAURAB JHALANI MAHIDOL2 522.5

51 TEO ENG CHIN UTM1 522.5

52 PAMELA PATDU UPM3 522.417

53 JESUS SIASON ADZ1 522.333

53 KATHRYN HAUTEA DLSU3 522.333

54 PERCIVAL PASTRANA UPD4 522.167

54 ROBYN EDWARD ANYE UTM1 522.167

55 LARINA SAN DIEGO UPM3 522.083

56 RJ ABADA DLSU1 522

56 CECILE FADRIGON DLSU3 522

56 CHERN HSING LEE MMU1 522

57 RUSSEL NG UTM1 521.833

58 JEFFREY BIANZA ADZ1 521.667

59 JOHN FAJARDO ADMU3 521.5

59 BIANCA RODRIGUEZ ADMU3 521.5

60 MARENAH CHERNO IIU2 521.417

61 ANN MATHEWS MMU2 521.333

61 JAMES OLIVER UST3 521.333

62 JEN HUIZHEN NGEE ANN1 521.25

63 RUBEN ACEBEDO UPD5 521.167

63 ANTHEA MAGPANTAY UPM2 521.167

64 LOGANDRAN BALAVIDEMDRA MMU1 520.833

65 ARNEL CLARITO ADZ3 520.75

66 LILIBETH ALMONTE UPD3 520.667

67 JENILEE AWICHEN ADZ2 520.333

68 PIYACHAT SRIKUREJA MAHIDOL1 520.167

68 SYLVIA JOACHIM MMU3 520.167

69 WILFRED SEGONIA ADMU4 520

69 AUSTINE LIM ADZ1 520

70 RYAN BUENAFE FEU1 519.917

71 MADELEINE DY ADMU5 519.833

71 AZRUL IZZAM IIU3 519.833

72 MICHAEL TUBOG SILLIMAN2 519.667

72 GHIA HURTADO UPM3 519.667

72 MARLON PLAZO ADMU4 519.667

72 CARLO LICUANAN DLSU3 519.667

73 NATALIE TANG CUHK1 519.583

74 PHUI SAN CHEONG MMU3 519.5

74 ADRIAN TANG NYP2 519.5

75 MIKE ALAR SILLIMAN1 519.417

76 YUNUS ZAKARIAH PUTRA1 519.333

77 PHILIP AREJOLA UPD4 519.167

78 GINGER WILSON NGEE ANN1 519.083

79 JECI DAVID ADMU4 519

79 DANIEL YEO NYP1 519

80 PAULINE BILLONES ADD1 518.917

80 CHARLENE LIM NYP2 518.917

81 DIANNE ROA UPD1 518.833

82 ANNIE HARIHARAN MMU2 518.5

83 TED TINEDO UPD4 518.167

83 KEIKO TSUJI ICU2 518.167

84 RICHARD LABITANG ADZ3 518

85 JOYCE BRIONES UPM2 517.5

86 JEREMY ONG NYP2 517.333

87 SHARMILA PARMANAND ADZ3 517.25

88 JR GUMABON USLS1 516.917

89 ALEXIS BORRES ADD1 516.75

90 TAKUTO CHIBA ICU1 516.667

91 NUBBIN ENDONILLA USLS2 516.5

92 JUMAR DEVERO SILLIMAN1 516.417

93 KYOKO ISHIDA TOKYO1 516.167

94 RAFFI ISMAIL NGEE ANN1 515.917

95 SAKIL SATYAL MAHIDOL2 515.833

96 RABINDRA DEV PRASAD UPS1 515

97 JOAQUIN CELDRAN XAVIER1 514.833

98 SRISUDA SRIWARIN WALAILAK1 514.75

99 WENCY FERNANDEZ UAP1 514.667

100 PONGSAKORN BUADAENGDEE WALAILAK2 514.583

101 KHATHAVUTH CHARUCHAREON MAHIDOL1 514.333

101 CHARMAINE POSA UPD1 514.333

102 JOHN PAUL ABASTILLAS USLS2 514.25

103 MA. ELOISA ORTEGA ADZ2 513.667

104 DAISUKE MATSUI ICU1 513.167

105 MARIKO TSUCHIDA ICU2 513

105 CHARUNEE PAL SINGH MAHIDOL3 513

106 MICHIKO SHOBU ICU2 512.5

106 JANICE O'HARA UPD1 512.5

107 MICHELI JORDA XAVIER1 512.333

108 PAUL ALONG XAVIER1 511.5

109 MASATOSHI FUKASAWA TOKYO1 511.25

110 IVAN ALCANTARA UAP1 511.167

111 KANOKWAN CHAWLA MAHIDOL3 510.833

111 SOMJAI NILNOREE WALAILAK1 510.833

112 FELICIA FERNANDEZ ADZ2 510.5

113 MORAKOT SUWANNAPHRUK WALAILAK2 510.417

114 TIDA CHONG MAHIDOL3 510.333

115 TAKESHI HOKONOHARA ICU1 510.167

116 FRANCES MAE GEVERA ADD1 509.667

117 SIWAPORN ARCHARIYA WALAILAK1 509.583

118 SHUNSUKE SHIOZUKA TOKYO1 508.583

119 DALE LAGONERA SILLIMAN2 508.5

120 BADRUL YUSOF UPS1 508.167

121 RATCHANANON KERDKEO WALAILAK2 507.417

122 SHARIFAH MAHMUTHA ALI UPS1 504.833

ASEAN Inter-Varsity environmental Debates

ASEAN Inter-varsity environmental debates


1999 - 1st ASEAN Environmental Debate


Host : International Islamic University of Malaysia
Winner: Singapore (Ngoei Wen Qing, Lee Kher Shing, Jonathan Yuen, Wee Beng Hui)
Run-up: Malaysia (Aizuddin Danian, Fahda Nur Ahmad Kamar, Andrew Yeo, Sucharit Pongprakyun)

2000 - 2nd ASEAN Environmental Debate
Host : University of Malaya (Malaysia)
Winner: Malaysia (Mohd. Sani Ismail, Mediha Mahmood, Chong Mei Yee, Tizreena Ismail)
Run-up: Singapore (Jonathan Yuen, Sangeetha Subbrahmanyam, Jean Ho, Abishek Jaswal)

No debate in 2001

Thailand will host in 2002

Information below supplied by Jonathan Yuen, National University of Singapore Debating Team

The Competition was held for the first time in Kuala Lumpur, by Malaysia, the host of this event.

The debates follow the All-Asians format (ie 3 man, 7 minute speeches, with points of information and a reply speech) where it differs is that the reply is 5 minutes long. More importantly, this debate format has included a 90 sec per speaker cross fire round that is held after all 3 substantive speeches from each side has been delivered, and is held before the reply speeches.

Teams get a total of 4 chances to speak, meaning that 1 of the 3 speakers gets to speak twice. Each speaking block is 90 seconds. The time block is forfeited if a speaker doesn't speak within the first 15 seconds of being given his 90 sec block and the turn passes over to the opposing team. But the opposing team does not benefit from the 'extra time' that the non-speaker lost.